|
Mega Trends 2010 in Sri Lanka
|
How is the year 2010 going to be for Sri Lanka?
What are the likely trends? |
The
year 2009 had been a remarkable year of achievement for Sri Lanka. By
May 2009 President Mahinda Rajapaksa managed to lead the country to
eliminate the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Tigers (LTTE) founder leader
Prabhakaran its entire leadership. But significantly, he failed to carry
the nation as a united entity to handle post war problems of economic
woes of the poor, human rights and humanitarian aberrations and ethnic
distrust. So it was a dismal ending of a great year.
Here is an assessment on three issues
-
politics,
-
international affairs
-
and human rights - based on analysis of major events of 2009 to identify
Sri Lanka's major trends in 2010.
Political
The remarkable year of 2009 ended in a sour note when the President
allowed political expediency to take over and advanced the presidential
poll by two years to January 26, 2010. When one of the chief architects
of military victory General Sarath Fonseka challenged the president’s
bid for a second term in office, the polity and people have been polarized.
The nation is divided vertically when unity was the key to reap the
dividends of peace.
Thus we find the nation using irreplaceable resource of human Endeavour
on a political exercise instead of addressing vital national issues
that have a strategic connotation on Sri Lanka’s future. The
issues include kick starting the national economy to pay off war debts,
upgrading human resources stunted during the war years, redress of
historical grievances of minorities and rectifying human rights and
humanitarian aberrations.
The President is leading the race in the run up to the elections.
However, General Fonseka, the common opposition candidate, is improving
his competitiveness. He has revamped his campaign making a foray into
Jaffna peninsula, a no-go area for any erstwhile army commander without
escort for the last 25 years. Apparently Fonseka is determined to
improve his trust quotient among Tamils which suspects his new found
sympathy for Tamils plight. However, unless the former political ally
of the LTTE – The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) –makes
up its mind to support him he is unlikely to get no large scale Tamil
support. With the government in power in a position to indirectly
trade off favours, the TNA’s much delayed decision may not be
wholehearted even in the unlikely event of favouring Fonseka.
Compared to the General, President Rajapaksa is better placed to win
Tamil votes despite historical Tamil tilt towards the rival United
National Party (UNP). Thus it would be reasonable to expect the President
to win the mandate for a second term.
If that happens we can expect him to become even more assertive in
the run up to the parliamentary poll. His aim would be to strengthen
his coalition numbers in parliament as no single party by itself has
a chance to get an absolute majority in the proportional representation
system.
So the year 2010 will probably see the deferring of contentious questions
like abolition of executive presidency. Even with all good intentions,
in the coming year we can expect no dramatic improvement in other
hardy perennials – human rights, Tamil autonomy, and enforcement
of 13th and 17th amendments to the constitution. At best expect there
would probably be cosmetic changes through a patchwork quilt of measures
to buy time and space rather than paradigm changes because politically
that would be more convenient.
International affairs
Sri Lanka is likely to adopt a more conciliatory profile with nations
which matter because it would need their support to prop up its war
ravaged economy, handle embarrassing human rights and humanitarian
issues coming up internationally, and take maximum advantage of the
strategic power play in the Indian Ocean and South Asian regions.
Sri Lanka's relations with the U.S. are likely to undergo a face lift
with. The Obama administration already indicating its mood to forget
and forgive in reshaping its Sri Lanka policy. Of course, Sri Lanka
has to thank the increasing footprint of China in the country for
change in the U.S. attitudes. Otherwise the U.S. would not have suddenly
discovered it should have "an integrated strategy that leverages
political, economic, and security tools for more effective long-term
reforms" in Sri Lanka.
Of course 2010 will be the year of sizeable increase in the Chinese
profile beyond its projects in Sri Lanka. We can expect the markets
to open up for a flood of Chinese goods giving a run for the money
to Indian and local brands. Towards the year end probably we would
see the first of the Chinese tourists in large number.
Indian response to the Chinese moves could be slow in its own ponderous
pace. The focus would be on developmental activity in the Tamil areas
and taking up other projects long in incubation. In 2010 Indian concerns
with Af-Pak region are likely to occupy greater space in its foreign
policy preoccupations due to the likely downsizing of the U.S. profile
in the region as prelude to progressive military disengagement in
that region. Despite this, with the Tamil Nadu legislative elections
due in another year the Tamil issue could be brought back to the top
of the open agenda from backroom parleys. So Sri Lanka will be required
to handle this isue whether it likes it or not.
The EU despite periodic fulminations about extending the GSP+ tariff
concessions may well end up striking a compromise. The EU rarely takes
abrupt or precipitate action in handling such situations. Usually
it provides enough space for the other nation to evolve a workable
solution. Moreover, it has both strategic and commercial interests
in the region and cannot exclude itself in the power game in the region.
Britain's Sri Lanka relations had a forgettable year in 2009. They
are unlikely to fare any better in 2010 due to Britain's own political
compulsions in responding to ethnic Tamil lobbying and human rights
pressures outweighing other considerations.
|
|